With experts reporting that some shots were over 400 yards that eliminates the AGR building as second shooter location. But the video did add context to the story. Too many officers making it look like Uvaldi.
I haven’t seen any credible reporting of a shot of 400 yds only 400 or so feet with a possibility of one extra shot fired from feet within the same vicinity. I have posted relevant legibile videos to my YouTube and rumble.
The 400 yards is the distance of the counter sniper shot. The two teams on the roofs seen behind Trump did not make the kill shot.
I personally think the other sniper was in the second story in the building behind the supposed shooter. He was the backup in case the kid was not accurate. A bullet hit a man sitting high on the left side of the bleachers on Trump's right side and more bullets hit two others on the left and right sides of the bleachers on Trump's left. Shots I think were direct from the building behind the AGR and to its left.
I only heard of a shot from 100 -150 yards further which would have been the rapid fire after the first 3. That’s plausible from the tower. I do agree about the angle of the shot from roof down to Trump would have caused the bullets trajectory to keep going down, not up to the highest bleacher level.
Might be better if you explain that instead of saying stop it as if I’m trying to spread false news. There’s no need to be rude, we’re all figuring it out with questions or ideas.
There has never at any time been evidence to support a person of any type on the water tower.
I posted a video here, in fact that disspelled it. People make hundreds of thousands of dollars every year, PER ACCOUNT, by spreading disinformation as a business model.
It's been disinformation since John Cullen invented the idea, I called him out, and he started mass-blocking everyone who spoke up.
I will NOT tolerate blatantly, easily-debunked misinformation here. I'm sorry if that offends you.
That doesn’t offend me, your tone does. I’m new to your channel and have not had a chance to cover everyone of your videos. You could have just as easily stated, no we already debunked that here without the rude “Just stop” as if I’m someone who is trying to argue with you instead of someone who is appreciative of your work. Take a step back, we aren’t all here to attack you or your findings. Some are here trying to see what you see.
Very few are here in earnest and that "theory" has already been circulating for two weeks while being debunked and disregarded by anyone else serious. That's all I know about anyone here. Again, apologies.
Thank you. I get it, there’s a ton of trolling and egos. I don’t envy what any of you have to endure.
I’d been wondering why it had been thrown to the wayside by Congress and reports. Last night I saw a a video from a different angle and the tower that didn’t look as nefarious as the one that captured the one SUV through the trees blocking the rest of the vehicles parked there. It goes to show how one really needs to see the whole picture.
No worries about me I’m genuinely just a nerd with questions niggling at me, lol.
With experts reporting that some shots were over 400 yards that eliminates the AGR building as second shooter location. But the video did add context to the story. Too many officers making it look like Uvaldi.
I haven’t seen any credible reporting of a shot of 400 yds only 400 or so feet with a possibility of one extra shot fired from feet within the same vicinity. I have posted relevant legibile videos to my YouTube and rumble.
The 400 yards is the distance of the counter sniper shot. The two teams on the roofs seen behind Trump did not make the kill shot.
I personally think the other sniper was in the second story in the building behind the supposed shooter. He was the backup in case the kid was not accurate. A bullet hit a man sitting high on the left side of the bleachers on Trump's right side and more bullets hit two others on the left and right sides of the bleachers on Trump's left. Shots I think were direct from the building behind the AGR and to its left.
I only heard of a shot from 100 -150 yards further which would have been the rapid fire after the first 3. That’s plausible from the tower. I do agree about the angle of the shot from roof down to Trump would have caused the bullets trajectory to keep going down, not up to the highest bleacher level.
Nothing about the tower is plausible nor possible. Stop it.
Might be better if you explain that instead of saying stop it as if I’m trying to spread false news. There’s no need to be rude, we’re all figuring it out with questions or ideas.
There has never at any time been evidence to support a person of any type on the water tower.
I posted a video here, in fact that disspelled it. People make hundreds of thousands of dollars every year, PER ACCOUNT, by spreading disinformation as a business model.
It's been disinformation since John Cullen invented the idea, I called him out, and he started mass-blocking everyone who spoke up.
I will NOT tolerate blatantly, easily-debunked misinformation here. I'm sorry if that offends you.
That doesn’t offend me, your tone does. I’m new to your channel and have not had a chance to cover everyone of your videos. You could have just as easily stated, no we already debunked that here without the rude “Just stop” as if I’m someone who is trying to argue with you instead of someone who is appreciative of your work. Take a step back, we aren’t all here to attack you or your findings. Some are here trying to see what you see.
Very few are here in earnest and that "theory" has already been circulating for two weeks while being debunked and disregarded by anyone else serious. That's all I know about anyone here. Again, apologies.
Thank you. I get it, there’s a ton of trolling and egos. I don’t envy what any of you have to endure.
I’d been wondering why it had been thrown to the wayside by Congress and reports. Last night I saw a a video from a different angle and the tower that didn’t look as nefarious as the one that captured the one SUV through the trees blocking the rest of the vehicles parked there. It goes to show how one really needs to see the whole picture.
No worries about me I’m genuinely just a nerd with questions niggling at me, lol.