Could 2023 Be The Year It All Finally Changes?
There are no party lines with institutionalized corruption... There are apparently no national lines either... How don't conflicts of *national* interest on this level rise to criminality? It should.
I’m not going to waste your time with exquisite detail in this article — that part is already done in prior articles.
As of late, Jim Hoft of The Gateway Pundit, Natalie Winters, Kanekoa The Great, and National File have published a flurry of articles, all of which outwardly face a similar subject matter to my own investigation — the state of American national cybersecurity, elections, and Chinese Communist Party infiltration, writ large.
If you’re already one of my subscribers, there’s no need to tell you how hilarious it is to see those articles come out around the same time. If you’re not a subscriber, however, you can take care of that before we start, right here:
We’re just going to get down to brass tacks here.
As always, I encourage you to explore the citations, get familiar with the information yourself, and draw your own conclusions.
Not Very EINSTEIN
As The Gateway Pundit recently pointed out, the “Albert System” is a real-time cybersecurity threat detection system employed on 98% of American election systems. It is part of a wider platform created and deployed by the Department of Homeland Security around 2003 called “EINSTEIN.”
A massive public-private (mostly private) initiative to outfit all American systems with these sensors was implemented by CISA and the Center for Internet Security (CIS) following the 2016 United States Presidential elections. Oddly enough (or not), the Albert System had already built a reputation as a six billion-dollar blunder that detected only six percent of security vulnerabilities at the time.
It was deployed en masse despite never addressing in full the publicly-disclosed vulnerabilities through a 2014 Government Accountability Office report that, by all accounts, seemed to continue into 2016.
Very unsettling is how difficult it was to eventually navigate the (public, “transparent”) CISA website to find anything about the agency’s private partnerships. To detect these threats, CISA, utilizes a team called the Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT), whose charge is, in part, to evaluate cybersecurity vulnerabilities for CISA.
Very soon after my learning what is highlighted next, Natalie Winters reported on an episode of Steve Bannon’s War Room of the CCP planting pro-China stories in American press through think-tanks like the Carnegie Institute.
Upon hearing the report, coupled with all of the latest revelations of the #TwitterFiles and CISA involvement, it immediately conjured a recollection of uncovering the following.
By clicking “CERT Coordination Center” on the CISA website, it links to “www.cert.org,” which then redirects to Carnegie Mellon University. It was actually surprising for certain unspoken reasons, but no. Not really.
Some of CERT’s most consequential work includes reverse engineering malware and developing ways to combat international cyberthreats, including those from China. China is regarded by CISA as one of four nation-state actors that pose a cyberthreat to U.S. national security, along with Russia, North Korea, and Iran.
Another Carnegie Mellon division, the Artificial Intelligence Division, specializes in national security applications of its expertise.
Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute acts as a primary threat detector for CISA and nearly the entire national security infrastructure, by all indications.
Thinking This Is About CISA?
While CISA, CIS, and EI-ISAC was RAMROD-ing its $6 billion technological flop unseemingly called “Albert” and “EINSTEIN” into the nation’s election systems in 2016, CMU’s CERT was still identifying security vulnerabilities for CISA.
Recall that China is regarded by CISA as one of four nation-state actors that pose a cyberthreat to U.S. national security, along with Russia, North Korea, and Iran.
The president of CMU from 2013 to 2017 is also member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Elected in 2014, Dr. Subra Suresh joined the Academy years before the communist military technology incubator relaxed its previously stringent guidelines for admission.
The Chinese Communist Party and its Academy of Sciences then had a direct line at the absolute highest level into CISA and the entire U.S. cybersecurity apparatus and its ongoing technical evaluations.
CMU President Dr. Subra Suresh also previously served as Director of the National Science Foundation from 2010 to 2013. The National Science Foundation was an integral part in Michigan State University biometrics research during his tenure there. NSF was the spearhead of the Center for Identification Technology Research, or CITeR, for short.
CITeR
CITeR was originally funded by the National Science Foundation, DHS, DOJ, FBI, and private contributions, and was originally stationed at West Virginia University. One key private contributor to the program was biometrics mega-giant Cogent Systems.
Cogent Systems was sold in 2010 by Ming Hsieh, current owner of Fulgent Genetics, and still-current CEO of Cogent. Fulgent Genetics was in the crosshairs of a 2021 uproar around allegations of Los Angeles County citizens’ genetic data being sent to Chinese servers.
It was the FBI who alerted L.A. County Sheriff Alex Villanueva to the potential compromise. They openly announced to the world that they were aware of the ongoing worldwide Chinese data-harvesting operation. The L.A. County District Attorney has also alleged the very same practice being exercised by a Michigan election company called Konnech.
In fact, the entire NSF’s CITeR program relocated from West Virginia University to Michigan State University in 2019 as one of Michigan State University’s chief computer scientists, Anil Jain, was also admitted to the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
As an apparent benefactor of the People’s Republic of China’s “Thousand Talents Plan,” Jain began a three-year tenure in 2009 at Tsinghua University in the Haidian District. Tsinghua University is, too, located in a Chinese “High-Tech Development Zone” that includes multiple Zhongguancun (ZGC) science and technology parks and multiple locations operated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
One of the “foreign expert” requirements was to physically go and research in China for at least nine months per year for three consecutive years.
Another researcher at Michigan State University, who worked closely on these U.S. surveillance state programs was Rong Jin. He has since 2015 moved into a position with Alibaba, and is a 1998 (a key year for Chinese talent initiatives) graduate of Peking University, which is located in the Haidian District of Beijing.
Token (Highly Relevant) Konnech Plug
In hindsight, Michigan State partner and American election company, Konnech also evidently benefitted from research performed in the very same Michigan State University biometrics laboratory. This research was passed off, almost textually verbatim, by Konnech’s Mainland China sister-company, Jinhua Yulian, also called Jinhua Konnech, and transferred to startup, Jinhua Hongzheng.
Konnech transferred a “motion gestures”-based technology to Jinhua Hongzheng, which may have made its way all the way back to the PRC and People’s Liberation Army’s R&D conglomerate, Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC). This was assisted by Microsoft and Chinese Academy of Sciences talent pipelines, and through private education research grants, funded by the Financial Advisor to the President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, himself.
In fact, with regard to the Michigan election company called Konnech, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the PRC:
directly enabled Konnech, an American election company, and their founding technology from before its inception;
Housed Konnech’s sister-company in the Mainland, Jinhua Yulian, at a CAS technology park in Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, China;
further financed through Dr. Jonathan Choi’s Sun Wah Group the development of American Konnech’s two flagship data-collection platforms, BestBrief and PollChief;
positioned Konnech’s co-founder, Lionel Ni, in a senior role overseeing major pipelines of Mainland Chinese and foreign research talent in conjunction with Microsoft:
Click the image for my dive into the Konnech co-founder behind this. Full article: microsoft.com and directly funneled money through Michigan State University, while “co-founder” Lionel Ni, Konnech co-founder and CEO, Eugene Yu, and Eugene Yu’s wife, Michigan State University Distinguished Professor of Medicine, Donna Wang, all set up a series of shell companies to facilitate the transactions — all dating back to as early as 1998 and persisting through 2022.
Back To Boogeyman China
Technology is absorbed from the Chinese “private” sector upward and integrated into the State and its (literally named) Military-Industrial corporations, where further, the resulting achievements and products thereof are subsequently distributed downward from the State. These distributions take the form of financial compensation, political appointments, academic status, business registrations, patents, trademarks, or other intellectual property.
The Chinese Academy of Sciences is firmly rooted at ground-zero for Chinese technological development in Beijing’s high-tech hub-district. This geographical area is the beginning and the end of all Chinese government and military technological development.
There is accompanying significance to any businesses allowed to operate within Beijing, or much less within the premiere science and technology districts inside of China, and speaks to the Central Committee’s steep expectations in doing so.
Microsoft has been directly in business with the Chinese government and the Academy of Sciences since 2016. Their joint-venture, China NetInfo (Network Information) Technology Co., is registered at the physical location of the University of the Academy of Sciences in Beijing.
The entity known as Microsoft Corporation has been doing business in China since 1995, officially as Microsoft China. Microsoft Corporation is listed as a shareholder for both of these, thus distinguishing Microsoft Corporation from Microsoft China, as well as China NetInfo. Konnech’s parent partner, China Aerospace Industry Corporation, or CASIC, is also nearby.
Microsoft has an extensive and embarrassing past, as it pertains to cybersecurity and intrusions. This makes for an interesting pairing with the open fact that Microsoft, Konnech, and CISA’s cybersecurity vulnerability watchdog, CERT, are all tied intimately to the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
But we’re still not quite finished.
“5th Generation” of “Just The Way It Is”
…and it’s why things are the way they are.
The Chinese quagmire of intrusion into American cyber infrastructure (even at the election and federal government levels) isn’t a new one. The People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Communist Party have told America for over a decade that they are engaged in a full-scale war against her.
This war, however, is not noticeable without understanding the battlefield on which it is waged. If you are not familiar with the concept of “5th generation warfare,” it is absolutely critical to get familiar with it, in order to understand the “chaos” surrounding society in 2023.
In fact, it’s not chaotic at all. It is quite structured, to be sure, and… “systemic,” to borrow a popular term.
None Of This Is “News”
Put aside the punditry of “stolen elections” for a moment. “The way things are” is a direct result of the American military-industrial complex and the federal bureaucracy, itself. Big corporations (owned by those in the “top 1%”) have influenced and leveraged Wall Street and the Federal Reserve, international organizations, and colluded with American politicians.
They’ve done so by creating a filthy, legal web of conflicting interests by manipulating governmental jurisdictions, engaging in lawfare with private citizens, and adopting tactics used by money laundering apparatuses and corrupt puppet governments worldwide, including cryptocurrency money-laundering schemes to fund American political campaigns
Many of these revelations into the public-private collusion and state-corporate merger have finally been laid bare to the public by Elon Musk and the #TwitterFiles. Interestingly enough, Twitter and Truth Social seem to be the only places where these revelations get any oxygen to the public.
The entire #TwitterFiles information operation and subsequent U.S. bureaucratic response have been a jarring picture of the government’s desperation to stifle the everyday, private American citizens’ ability to simply know and learn things for themselves.
A Sino-American Global Influence Campaign
Another, separately striking revelation from National File recently highlighted a top California Republican and his close ties to ZGC Capital, a Silicon Valley tech incubator which is entrenched into high-tech development zones in China. There are five of these zones in Beijing. The Central government has direct involvement in the planning an implementation of these zones.
Speaker of the House hopeful, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and his California GOP’s Vice Chair, Peter Kuo, are entangled, respectively, in Microsoft and ZGC Innovation Center — which in the PRC is like saying water and waterhose.
Microsoft still enjoys an extensive and fruitful relationship with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, while ZGC Innovation Center is a Silicon Valley start-up incubator. This incubator has deep ties to a sprawling network of science parks in Beijing through Mainland China parent group, ZGC Group — also directly connected to the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
ZGC Capital is owned solely by Beijing’s ZGC Group. They are even registered with the People’s Republic of China at a common address.
A list of their Mainland subsidiaries can be found here, and a list of their notable Mainland investors is found here.
Pictured on their website, among the list of ZGC Capital’s investors are China Securities and Sequoia Capital. Sequoia Capital is currently under intense scrutiny for its own intimate relationship with Beijing.
Here is a detailed overview of all sixteen ZGC Science Parks that are administered by the PRC. The images below are composites from ZGC-related Chinese resources.
Again in my explorations, Bohai Rim emerged from the ether, unprovoked, this time from ZGC’s Tongzhou Park. Bohai Harvest-RST is the much-maligned (USD) $1.5B Sinopec slush fund set up by the communist Chinese government to inject foreign capital into their oil industry.
The Chinese Academy of Sciences Financial Advisor, Dr. Jonathan Choi of the Sun Wah Group was also the Chairman of the Bohai Rim Entrepreneur’s Association. Dr. Jonathan Choi who evidently set up a money-funneling mechanism between his foundation, Sun Wah Group, Michigan State University, and the American election company known as Konnech, and its CEO, Eugene Yu.
Z-Park
Previously mentioned, both the Academy and Microsoft are both intrinsically linked to the United States national cybersecurity apparatus.
It turns out that ZGC is a major factor in Beijing securing international capital to inject into startup companies born from de facto Chinese military researchers. From ZGC Xicheng Garden:
Pictured here, it shows ZGC Group as the controlling stakeholder (51%) in Beijing Zhongguan Village International Incubator Co., Ltd. (北京中关村国际孵化器有限公司).
Shown in this public listing, ZGC Incubator does business in China through public-facing entity, Incubase. Following the provided link now leads to a dead end. However, through the Wayback archives, it’s obvious this website’s absence is a very recent development.
From an archived version of the page:
Here is a list of websites for many of ZGC’s self-proclaimed subsidiaries.
I even see as part of Beijing’s IP-harvesting company GGV Capital, another face of Tiger Global Management, a company who dumped enormous money into establishing a Mainland counterpart (and “full replacement”) to data authentication giant, Okta. That company was called Authing.
“But What Does It All Mean, Basil?”
We know the FBI lies to the American public, and for some people just learning of this, it’s been happening their entire lives. It doesn’t happen by exception, it’s the FBI’s M.O — par for the government course.
The January 6th Committee hilariously referred to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as the “Federal Bureau of Intelligence” in their December, 2022 paperweight of a House Committee report on January 6, 2021.
Today, it leaves me wondering if it was a typo or a Freudian dogwhistle.
The FBI, itself suppressed facts from reaching the public and coordinated with the intelligence community — including cybersecurity bodies like CISA.
CISA, during it’s big 2016 drive to “secure elections,” was in fact partnered with Carnegie Mellon University to research security vulnerabilities on a device that only detects specific types of incursions, by design, anyway. Carnegie Mellon University, whose President was a timely inductee into the Chinese Academy of Sciences in early 2014. He was there until the program bore results and departed in mid-2017.
The only questions left to cover would be,
Why would the “people’s representatives” and the USIC ignore, coverup, and even deny American data being vulnerable to malicious foreign state actors, but not China?
And furthermore,
Why would top Republicans in Congressional leadership carry water for the USIC while also standing by silent on the insecurity and compromise of American elections — even when it hinders their own party’s success?
You guessed it.
Money.
April 7, 2014:
What does that have to do with the U.S. Congress?
You guessed it.
Also money.
Remember Ming Hsieh — the Cogent Systems CEO, synonymous with U.S. DoD, DOJ, and NSF biometrics research — owner of Fulgent Genetics, who allegedly sent L.A. County citizens’ DNA data to China through Covid-19 tests?
He, too has leadership of the “opposition party” in his pocket.
Often of late, I recall back to 2016 and what was, to me, a stunner of a surprise in Bernie’s loss in the 2016 Democrat Party primary.
After all of the recent hullaballoo around the FBI, DHS, CISA, their suppression of information through the press, the promotion of Chinese press, the AI algorithmic suppression of speech through social media…I now also question whether Bernie even lost the 2016 Democrat primaries fair and square.
It makes me question 2018, 2020, 2022, and even offers insight into the behavior of American elites around all of those elections, including the lack of Democrat legal challenges in 2016 — they had rather you stay unaware and uninformed to their systems *and lose* than have this information come out in court and be brought to the American and global public — it’s just that simple.
As long as those responsible for wrongful actions are also funding the investigation of those actions, American Joe-shmoes will be enslaved by these issues indefinitely.
Explain again how it’s good thing for America to become more Chinese.
This has gone far enough.
The reason your career politicians aren’t concerned about common citizens is because common citizens aren’t as rich as the global corporations or their owners who are funding the politicians’ campaigns (sometimes illegally).
The reason they won’t speak up about even one thing like Fulgent or Konnech is because to kick one stick in the house of cards brings the whole damned thing to the ground.
Well, then allow me.
It has to start somewhere.
Nice to see you are back linking the complex Ministry of Deception (our gov) to their army of players on the tech side. There are plenty more foreigner on the soft underbelly side.
Glenn Beck was right a decade ago when he spent a full week on how the merging of gov, media, education, tech, corporations, military and possibly churches was already here. You are right about 2016. Their own bloated egos all around was the downfall when actual voters did an unexpected ambush and ruined Hillary's parade into the WH.
Quick question - should I re-follow you on TS now? (Hilltop)